This op-ed column provides a platform for readers to share unique perspectives on the issues that
matter most. It’s a space for thoughtful commentary from people like you, who bring unique insights
and experiences to the conversation. Each article represents one personal window into a complex world.

 

It happens earlier than you think. You’re standing there, holding your toddler, wondering if the school application you’re filling out will shape the rest of your family’s future. And not in a warm, emotional kind of way, but in the concrete, rigid reality of school acceptance.

Because here’s what no one tells you when you start the school process: Once you get in, you’re in. And not just for this child. You’re now unofficially locked in for every child that comes after. The school becomes your family’s school. Your safe box. And in the jungle of school acceptance, it does feel like a safe box at first. But veering outside that box, even if your next child needs something different, becomes close to impossible.

A friend of mine learned this the hard way. She and her husband are a typical kollel family—wife teaching, husband learning, strong hashkafos hachaim. Yet when it came time to find a school for their oldest daughter, they chose a school that was slightly different than what they had originally envisioned—not because their values had shifted, but because their little girl needed something more tailored: a smaller class size, some resource support, and a warmer, less rigid approach.

They weren’t yet well-versed in the Lakewood school process and assumed that each future child would be considered on their own merits. That they could revisit the decision of “Which school is best for this child?” as needed. But when it came time to enroll their second daughter, a very different personality, strong academically and socially, they were told, “This is your family’s school now.” Switching wasn’t an option. They did try, but the system was too entrenched, and they resigned themselves to the reality.

By the time their last daughter came along, they didn’t even bother applying elsewhere. But the real problems started when their oldest daughter, who had grown tremendously from the warmth and resources in the school, needed to go to high school. When the family tried to get her into a high school that was a better match for her hashkafic path, they hit brick wall after brick wall. One principal told them outright: “If your daughter was coming from a different elementary school, we would consider her.” No explanations or pleading helped. The poor girl was finally pushed into a reluctant mosad the night before school started, humiliated and upset.

Why does this happen?

Because in our system, school placement often becomes shorthand for family identity. The assumption is: If you sent your first child to that school, it says something about who you are. Not about what your child needs. Not about what circumstances have changed. Just about your label.

And that rigidity hurts kids.

I experienced something similar when I felt that one of my children would do better socially in a new school. My other kids were happy, but that child really needed something different. My husband and I were told—not officially, but clearly—that if we wanted to send one child to a different school, we’d have to send all of them there. There’s no space in the system to say, “This daughter needs this, and that one needs something else.” It’s one-size-fits-all per family.

Let me be clear: Schools aren’t villains. They’re full of hardworking people doing the best they can under enormous pressure. But when the system becomes so tight that there’s no room for individuality, even among siblings, something’s off. Maybe the solution is to open more schools—but how will that help if we still insist that all siblings go to the same place no matter what?

The truth is that this isn’t just about schools. It’s about how we treat children in general. We say we believe that each child is a unique world. That Hashem gives each person their own tafkid in life. But then we force all kids into the same track, with no room for nuance. What if one child is academically gifted, while a sibling has learning differences? What if one child thrives in a structured, high-expectations environment, while another melts under pressure? What if one child needs warmth, flexibility, and room to grow slowly?

When the attitude is “Just be grateful you have a spot!” we lose sight of what school is supposed to be: not a badge of honor or a community gatekeeper, but a place to nurture each child individually.

We have to stop treating school applications like a sorting system that determines an entire future. And we have to stop shaming parents who try to make the best decisions for each child. Instead of asking, “Why are they trying to switch?” maybe we should ask, “What does this child need, and how can we help?”

Because when you hear the stories, they start to add up.

I heard from a parent whose child excelled in one school. When their younger son needed more support, they were told, “This isn’t the school for him.” But when they tried to place him elsewhere, the new school said, “We don’t take families that are already enrolled in another school.”

Where does that leave parents?

What happens when you’re not allowed to make a decision based on the child in front of you, but only on the box you’ve already been placed in?

We all know families with multiple children who have multiple needs. Are they all the same? Of course not. Are we really going to pretend that one school will magically be a fit for every sibling in every family?

This mindset may come from a good place: wanting to preserve a specific identity, consistency, an easier way to ensure that parents have a place to send their expanding families. But somewhere along the way, we forgot that families aren’t monoliths. That fit should be about the child, not the color of their uniform.

We need a little more flexibility. And a lot more empathy. Let’s stop pushing people into rigid categories based on a single decision they made for a single child at a single moment in time.

Let’s start supporting families who are doing the best they can, trying to raise each child according to his or her path.

“Chanoch l’na’ar al pi darko” isn’t just a nice slogan.

It’s a mandate.

It’s a challenge.

It’s a plea.

It’s a call to stop treating our schools like labels and our children like checkboxes. And to start building a system that serves the people we’re here to raise.

Do you have a perspective to share? Do you want to respond to an op-ed?
Submit your idea or response and start a conversation. Contact opinion@
thevoiceoflakewood.com. Selected pieces will be featured in upcoming editions.